Sunday, 12 May 2013
Qualifications means little to this CEO
Dr Low top 3 selection criteria of staff are Integrity, Faithfulness and Emotional Quotient. In this time, most people are educated but academic qualifications only tells that one are more analytical and logical and in today, it is more difficult to have candidate that posses the above 3 criteria as the new generation of people tends to be generally more self centred and less passionate in what they want to do. So the question is how do we size up Integrity, Faithfulness and Emotional Quotient. Is there any interview questions or tests that we can measure this traits in candidate that we interview? Comment if you have any answer to it.
Thursday, 11 April 2013
'Win-win' for both parties in Dovechem settlement
The settlement, agreed last December, brings to an end years of legal disputes. -ST
Maryam Mokhtar
Sat, Feb 16, 2013
The Straits Times
Sat, Feb 16, 2013
The Straits Times
SINGAPORE - A settlement reached between Dovechem founder Ng
Joo Soon and its majority shareholders will see the former withdrawing
from the company.
The settlement, agreed last December, brings to an end years of legal disputes, which included a high-profile court case in which Mr Ng Joo Soon successfully sued Dovechem's directors and was reinstated as a director.
The settlement, agreed last December, brings to an end years of legal disputes, which included a high-profile court case in which Mr Ng Joo Soon successfully sued Dovechem's directors and was reinstated as a director.
Dovechem chief executive Andrew Ng told The Straits Times on Tuesday that the settlement was a "win-win" for both parties.
"We thank God that we've reached an amicable settlement where no one loses out," he said.
"Whatever Mr Ng Joo Soon has requested, we have given to him.
"The past is the past and now, it is time for all of us to move on," he added.
The Straits Times understands that in addition to a substantial part of the assets from Dovechem Holdings, the rights to use the names Dovechem and Thiam Joo - the name originally used by the company when it was started in 1960 - would also be transferred to the founder.
Speaking to The Straits Times on Tuesday, Mr Ng Joo Soon said: "I'm satisfied, this is what I wanted and they've given it to me."
"Most importantly, the name of the company is mine. I built this company up from scratch and built it well," he added.
The remaining four shareholders are Mr Ng Joo Soon's brothers Ju Aik and Ju Lak, and nephews Andrew and Anta."We thank God that we've reached an amicable settlement where no one loses out," he said.
"Whatever Mr Ng Joo Soon has requested, we have given to him.
"The past is the past and now, it is time for all of us to move on," he added.
The Straits Times understands that in addition to a substantial part of the assets from Dovechem Holdings, the rights to use the names Dovechem and Thiam Joo - the name originally used by the company when it was started in 1960 - would also be transferred to the founder.
Speaking to The Straits Times on Tuesday, Mr Ng Joo Soon said: "I'm satisfied, this is what I wanted and they've given it to me."
"Most importantly, the name of the company is mine. I built this company up from scratch and built it well," he added.
In 2011, Mr Ng Joo Soon won a court order to wind up the company's
heavily indebted holding company here. He applied for it to go into
liquidation in order to get back $9 million owed to him.
Mr Andrew Ng said he is now in talks with liquidators as to "how best to manage the liquidation process in line with the terms of settlement".
Mr Andrew Ng said he is now in talks with liquidators as to "how best to manage the liquidation process in line with the terms of settlement".
Mr Ng Joo Soon founded a paint and thinner firm in 1960 which grew
into the Dovechem business empire, spanning Singapore, Malaysia,
Indonesia and China, with an annual turnover of about $500 million.
Over the years, he invited several family members to join the business, and in 2002, he handed the reins to his nephew Andrew Ng but remained as director.
A falling-out with these relatives led to his removal from the board when he turned 70 in 2008.
As a business owners how can you Ring Fence your most important asset - Your business. Think about it by using business structures which is normally recommended by accountant may not necessary be the best way. Remember as an director of company you have this director fiduciary duties. So long your partners or directors can prove that there is breach of your duties they can come after you.
There are other alternatives solutions that we can help you. Speak to us if you have this concern now.
Over the years, he invited several family members to join the business, and in 2002, he handed the reins to his nephew Andrew Ng but remained as director.
A falling-out with these relatives led to his removal from the board when he turned 70 in 2008.
As a business owners how can you Ring Fence your most important asset - Your business. Think about it by using business structures which is normally recommended by accountant may not necessary be the best way. Remember as an director of company you have this director fiduciary duties. So long your partners or directors can prove that there is breach of your duties they can come after you.
There are other alternatives solutions that we can help you. Speak to us if you have this concern now.
Alleged breach of director's duties: Fashion retailer sued
The liquidators claimed their probe revealed “very substantial
intercompany transfers of monies and other assets and the misuse of
Living The Link’s funds”.
Court documents state that Living The Link transferred inventory of about $1.29 million and fixed assets of about $360,000 to The Link Boutique, and inventory of about $1.34 million – all in book value – to alldressedup.
According to the documents, Living The Link also made cash payments of $3.93 million to The Link Boutique and $270,000 to alldressedup.
The plaintiffs added that Living The Link transferred to The Link Boutique a 20 per cent stake it held in a company called Graha Lifestyle. The plaintiffs said that as sole director of Living The Link, Mrs Tan-Leo had a legal duty to act in its interests and avoid conflicts of interest.
By the fourth quarter of 2008, when Living The Link was insolvent or potentially so, she owed these duties to its creditors.
They alleged that she “procured” the transfers without providing consideration and without obtaining proper valuations. These were not deals conducted at “arms length”, in which both sides acted independently.
Court documents state that Living The Link transferred inventory of about $1.29 million and fixed assets of about $360,000 to The Link Boutique, and inventory of about $1.34 million – all in book value – to alldressedup.
According to the documents, Living The Link also made cash payments of $3.93 million to The Link Boutique and $270,000 to alldressedup.
The plaintiffs added that Living The Link transferred to The Link Boutique a 20 per cent stake it held in a company called Graha Lifestyle. The plaintiffs said that as sole director of Living The Link, Mrs Tan-Leo had a legal duty to act in its interests and avoid conflicts of interest.
By the fourth quarter of 2008, when Living The Link was insolvent or potentially so, she owed these duties to its creditors.
They alleged that she “procured” the transfers without providing consideration and without obtaining proper valuations. These were not deals conducted at “arms length”, in which both sides acted independently.
Overview of Singapore Business Entities
Talk to us to find out more what is the different
Restoran Soon Soon Huat: Bak Kut Teh @ Taman Sentosa
The herbal strong is not as strong as normal Klang
and KL Bak Kut Teh. The soup is having slight herbal smell and taste. It
comes with enoki mushrooms, clam and some pork ribs. Most of the
customers that patron here came from Singapore. I guess Singaporean like
their bak kut teh soup to be clear?
Address: 236, Jalan Sutera, Taman Sentosa, 80150, Johor Bahru, Johor
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)